Tartu Ringkonnakohus publishes this announcement under Subsection 8 of § 100³ of the Bankruptcy Act (PankrS).

By order of 04.11.2024 in civil proceedings No 2-23-2568, the list of creditors submitted by the debtor's, Aivo Pärn (national identification 36802262761) (in bankruptcy), trustee, was confirmed.

An appeal against a ruling by which a court has approved a list of creditors may be filed by the trustee, the debtor who filed an objection, the creditor who filed or received an objection and the creditor whose request for restoring the claim was not satisfied may lodge an appeal within 15 days of service of the order (paragraph 100³ (7) of the PankrS, paragraph 661(2) of the TsMS).
RESOLUTION1. Dismiss Albin Tituk and Jaan Soometsa's request for witnesses to be interrogated .2.Use the annexes to the OÜ saguna and Prestante OÜ appeals: claims of 30 November 2023 with annexes, inquiries of 27 February 2024 and replies of the administrator of 28 February 2024, observations and annexes of 29 February 2024. 3.Please attach to the materials of the case the claim of the insolvency administrator of TartEst OÜ (bankrupt), forwarded by the insolvency administrator Tiia Kalaus. 4.Cancellation of the order of 23 April 2024 of Tartu County Court in so far as the County Court refused to recognise the claim of OÜ saguna of EUR 4126.68 and THE claim of up Varud OÜ (bankrupt) of 42,090 euros and imposed a new order in the annulled part of Sections.5.Teha new order, recognising as Grade II claims OÜ saguna the claim of EUR 4126.68 and THE claim of THE liquidator of UP Varud OÜ (in bankruptcy) of EUR 42 090 and appointing new titles in Grade II. In so far as the operative part of the ruling of the county court remains unchanged in the contested part, complete the full text of the operative part of the ruling of the county court .6.Read the full text of the ruling of the county court as follows: (1) dismiss the objection of 10 April 2024 raised by Mr Jaan Soometsa and Mr Albin Tituk to the action of the Court; 2) Approve the final list of creditors in the bankruptcy proceedings of Aivo Pärna (in bankruptcy) as follows: Step II (§ 153 (1) point 2 of the PankrS) debt trustAcknowledgeable receivables § 1003 (4) of the PankrS Section, %Võlgniku Statement of objections as Go Group (11071150) 382 640,26 jah74, 17 jahSwedbank AS (10060701) 87 070,95 ei16, 88 eiOÜ saguna (12116021) 4126,68 ei0, 80 eiUP Varud OÜ (bankrupt) (12408232) bankruptcy trustee Sirje Tael42 090,00 ei8, 16 jah3) not to recognise the following receivabo Pärn (bankrupt) claims in bankruptcy proceedings: - claim of as Go Group EUR 9 365.50; - THE claim of the liquidator of up Varud OÜ (bankrupt) EUR 1 720 182.48; - a claim of EUR 1 060 392,00 from the insolvency administrator of the municipality of MRP, OÜ (in bankruptcy); - claim of AS Mardin Grupp (end. business name AS Wipestrex Grupp) (bankrupt) EUR 2 155 405.00; - Albin Tituk and Jaan Soomets claim EUR 2 141 040,00; - Raivo Pärnpuu claim 209 154.00 euros; - a claim of 615 002.42 euros by a trustee in bankruptcy of TartEst OÜ (in bankruptcy); - Prestante OÜ claim of 279 327.40 euros; - claim of Sparer OÜ EUR 56 500,00; - claim of saguna OÜ EUR 1 083 469.02; - claim of Põlva bus station OÜ 150 000.00 euros; - claim of Wipestreks real estate Development OÜ 626 184.91 euros; - CLAIM of APW Kinnisvarahaldus OÜ Ltd EUR 481 698.88; - Jaan Uibo's claim of 49,000 euros. 4) the claims do not constitute joint and several liability or claims arising from a conditional transaction or ancillary condition of an administrative act. 5) the procedural expenses of the parties to the proceedings shall be borne by the parties to the proceedings. In the light of the division of procedural expenses, the procedural expenses shall not be determined in monetary terms. 7. Grant the ruling appeal of OÜ saguna and THE appeal against the ruling of the bankruptcy trustee of up Varud OÜ (in bankruptcy) in part and leave the appeals against the orders of Prestante OÜ, Jaan Soometsa and Albin Tituk, the insolvency trustee of the private limited company MRP city (in bankruptcy) and the bankruptcy trustee of TartEst OÜ (in bankruptcy) to be satisfied .8.leave the procedural expenses related to the appeal proceedings to the parties to the proceedings.